Common Mistakes When Using jQuery

jQuery has been a popular JavaScript library for years, simplifying DOM manipulation, event handling, and AJAX. Even though modern JavaScript has caught up in many ways, jQuery is still widely used—and still widely misused. This article walks through common mistakes developers make with jQuery and how to avoid them.

1. Overusing jQuery for simple tasks

One of the biggest mistakes is using jQuery for things that modern JavaScript can handle easily without any library. This leads to unnecessary dependencies and heavier pages.

Example of overuse

// Using jQuery just to select an element
var el = $('#my-element')[0];

A modern, library-free equivalent is straightforward:

const el = document.getElementById('my-element');

If your project already depends on jQuery, using it is fine—but avoid reaching for jQuery by default when native APIs are clear and concise.

2. Selecting elements inefficiently

jQuery makes it easy to select elements, but it’s also easy to write selectors that are more complex or expensive than necessary.

Overly complex selectors

// Too specific and potentially slow
var items = $('body div#container ul li.item');

A simpler, more efficient selector is usually enough:

var items = $('#container .item');

Prefer IDs and classes over long descendant chains. This improves readability and performance, especially on large pages.

3. Forgetting that jQuery objects are not DOM elements

A very common confusion is treating a jQuery object as if it were a single DOM element. jQuery collections are array-like wrappers around zero or more elements.

Incorrect usage

var el = $('#my-element');
el.innerHTML = 'Hello'; // This will not work

To access the underlying DOM element, you need to index into the jQuery object:

var el = $('#my-element')[0];
el.innerHTML = 'Hello';

Or, better yet, use jQuery’s own methods:

$('#my-element').html('Hello');

4. Not waiting for the DOM to be ready

Running jQuery code before the DOM is fully loaded can lead to null selections and unexpected behavior. Many beginners forget to wrap their code in a DOM-ready handler.

Correct DOM-ready pattern

$(document).ready(function () {
  // Safe to access DOM elements here
  $('#my-element').text('Loaded!');
});

The shorter form is also common:

$(function () {
  $('#my-element').text('Loaded!');
});

Without this, your selectors may run before elements exist, resulting in empty jQuery collections.

5. Binding events repeatedly and causing duplicates

Another frequent mistake is binding the same event handler multiple times, often inside functions that are called repeatedly (for example, after AJAX updates).

Problematic pattern

function init() {
  $('#save-button').on('click', function () {
    console.log('Saved!');
  });
}

// Called multiple times:
init();
init();

Each call to init() adds another click handler, so a single click may trigger multiple logs or actions.

Better approach

$('#save-button').off('click').on('click', function () {
  console.log('Saved!');
});

6. Ignoring event delegation

When elements are added dynamically (for example, via AJAX), directly bound event handlers may not work on new elements. Developers often forget to use event delegation, leading to “sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t” bugs.

Non-delegated handler

// Only works for existing .item elements
$('.item').on('click', function () {
  console.log('Clicked item');
});

Delegated handler

$('#container').on('click', '.item', function () {
  console.log('Clicked item');
});

Here, the click event is bound to #container, and jQuery checks whether the actual target matches .item. This works for both existing and future elements.

7. Mixing jQuery and raw DOM APIs inconsistently

Mixing jQuery methods and native DOM methods is fine, but confusion arises when developers forget which type they’re working with. This often leads to errors like calling jQuery methods on plain DOM nodes or vice versa.

Confusing mix

var el = document.getElementById('my-element');
el.hide(); // Error: hide is not a function

To use jQuery methods, wrap the element:

var el = $('#my-element');
el.hide();

Or, if you prefer native APIs, stay consistent and use CSS classes or style properties instead of jQuery’s animation and visibility helpers.

8. Misusing AJAX helpers

jQuery’s AJAX helpers like $.ajax(), $.get(), and $.post() are convenient, but they’re often used without proper error handling or configuration.

Minimal, fragile AJAX call

$.get('/api/data', function (response) {
  console.log('Success', response);
});

This ignores failures, timeouts, and unexpected responses. A more robust pattern uses $.ajax() with success and error callbacks (or promises in newer codebases):

$.ajax({
  url: '/api/data',
  method: 'GET',
  dataType: 'json'
})
  .done(function (data) {
    console.log('Success', data);
  })
  .fail(function (jqXHR, textStatus, errorThrown) {
    console.error('Request failed:', textStatus, errorThrown);
  });

9. Not cleaning up: memory leaks and detached handlers

When elements are removed from the DOM, any associated event handlers and data should be cleaned up. While jQuery helps with this, problems can still occur if you manually detach elements or keep references around.

Potential leak

var $el = $('#panel');
$el.on('click', function () {
  console.log('Clicked panel');
});

// Later:
$el.remove(); // OK, but if other references exist, handlers may linger

Use jQuery’s methods consistently and avoid storing long-lived references to elements that are frequently created and destroyed. When in doubt, ensure that event handlers are removed with .off() if you manage elements manually.

10. Treating jQuery as mandatory in modern projects

A subtle but important “mistake” is assuming jQuery is required for any web project. Modern browsers support query selectors, class manipulation, fetch-based networking, and more—often making jQuery optional.

If you’re maintaining an existing jQuery-heavy codebase, understanding these mistakes will help you write cleaner, safer code. For new projects, consider whether jQuery truly adds value or whether native APIs and small, focused utilities might be a better fit.